NLM DIR Seminar Schedule
UPCOMING SEMINARS
-
Jan. 14, 2025 Ryan Bell
Comprehensive analysis of the YprA-like helicase family provides deep insight into the evolution and potential mechanisms of widespread and largely uncharacterized prokaryotic antiviral defense systems -
Jan. 16, 2025 Qingqing Zhu
GPTRadScore and CT-Bench: Advancing Multimodal AI Evaluation and Benchmarking in CT Imaging -
Jan. 17, 2025 Xuegong Zhang
Using Large Cellular Models to Understand Cell Transcriptomics Language -
Jan. 21, 2025 Qiao Jin
Artificial Intelligence for Evidence-based Medicine -
Jan. 28, 2025 Kaleb Abram
TBD
RECENT SEMINARS
-
Jan. 14, 2025 Ryan Bell
Comprehensive analysis of the YprA-like helicase family provides deep insight into the evolution and potential mechanisms of widespread and largely uncharacterized prokaryotic antiviral defense systems -
Dec. 17, 2024 Joey Thole
Training set associations drive AlphaFold initial predictions of fold-switching proteins -
Dec. 10, 2024 Amr Elsawy
AI for Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Optical Coherence Tomography -
Dec. 3, 2024 Sarvesh Soni
Toward Relieving Clinician Burden by Automatically Generating Progress Notes -
Nov. 19, 2024 Benjamin Lee
Reiterative Translation in Stop-Free Circular RNAs
Scheduled Seminars on Nov. 30, 2023
Contact NLMDIRSeminarScheduling@mail.nih.gov with questions about this seminar.
Abstract:
Recent work suggests that AlphaFold2 (AF2)–a deep learning-based model that accurately infers protein structure from sequence–can also discern important features of folded protein energy landscapes, defined by the diversity and frequency of different conformations in the folded state. Here, we test the limits of its predictive power on fold-switching proteins, which assume two structures with regions of distinct secondary and/or tertiary structure. Using several implementations of AF2, including two enhanced sampling approaches, we generated >280,000 models of 93 fold-switching proteins, the experimentally determined conformations of these were most-likely present in the AF2 training set. Combining all models, AF2 predicted fold switching with a modest success rate <25%, indicating that it does not readily sample both conformations of fold switchers overall. Furthermore, both of AF2’s confidence metrics selected against models consistent with experimentally determined fold-switching conformations in favor of inconsistent models. AF2’s performance on seven fold-switching proteins outside of its training set was then assessed by generating >159,000 structural models with the enhanced sampling method AF-cluster. Among all models of these seven targets, fold switching was accurately predicted in only one. Furthermore, AF2 demonstrated no ability to predict alternative conformations of two newly discovered targets without homologs in the set of 93 fold switchers. These results suggest that AF2 has more to learn about the underlying energetics of protein ensembles and indicate the need for further developments of methods that accurately predict multiple protein conformations.