NLM DIR Seminar Schedule
UPCOMING SEMINARS
-
July 3, 2025 Matthew Diller
Using Ontologies to Make Knowledge Computable -
July 15, 2025 Noam Rotenberg
Cell phenotypes in the biomedical literature: a systematic analysis and the NLM CellLink text mining corpus
RECENT SEMINARS
-
July 1, 2025 Yoshitaka Inoue
Graph-Aware Interpretable Drug Response Prediction and LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Drug-Target Interaction Prediction -
June 10, 2025 Aleksandra Foerster
Interactions at pre-bonding distances and bond formation for open p-shell atoms: a step toward biomolecular interaction modeling using electrostatics -
June 3, 2025 MG Hirsch
Interactions among subclones and immunity controls melanoma progression -
May 29, 2025 Harutyun Sahakyan
In silico evolution of globular protein folds from random sequences -
May 20, 2025 Ajith Pankajam
A roadmap from single cell to knowledge graph
Scheduled Seminars on Nov. 30, 2023
Contact NLMDIRSeminarScheduling@mail.nih.gov with questions about this seminar.
Abstract:
Recent work suggests that AlphaFold2 (AF2)–a deep learning-based model that accurately infers protein structure from sequence–can also discern important features of folded protein energy landscapes, defined by the diversity and frequency of different conformations in the folded state. Here, we test the limits of its predictive power on fold-switching proteins, which assume two structures with regions of distinct secondary and/or tertiary structure. Using several implementations of AF2, including two enhanced sampling approaches, we generated >280,000 models of 93 fold-switching proteins, the experimentally determined conformations of these were most-likely present in the AF2 training set. Combining all models, AF2 predicted fold switching with a modest success rate <25%, indicating that it does not readily sample both conformations of fold switchers overall. Furthermore, both of AF2’s confidence metrics selected against models consistent with experimentally determined fold-switching conformations in favor of inconsistent models. AF2’s performance on seven fold-switching proteins outside of its training set was then assessed by generating >159,000 structural models with the enhanced sampling method AF-cluster. Among all models of these seven targets, fold switching was accurately predicted in only one. Furthermore, AF2 demonstrated no ability to predict alternative conformations of two newly discovered targets without homologs in the set of 93 fold switchers. These results suggest that AF2 has more to learn about the underlying energetics of protein ensembles and indicate the need for further developments of methods that accurately predict multiple protein conformations.